Lamma Forums

The Baroque on Lamma
Page 13 of 15

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Thu Jul 26, 2012 9:47 am ]
Post subject: 

This is just one of several surveys commissioned by BoL necessary for a potential future re-application of the changing Baroque project.
Having lost the first round in the TPB last Dec, as expected they haven't given up.

Just a little more background and info about the archeological survey this summer:

The announcement of the survey in the "Blog of Baroque":

The application to Govt. for the archeological survey, with maps, are on the LivingLamma site:
More Developer activity in South Lamma.

Plus a "Letter to the Editor" in the SCMP last week. The letter is signed off as "Martin Bode, Wanchai", but Martin also lives in Mo Tat Wan with a great view over South Lamma from his rooftop, so he might be able to tell us more about the survey in progress in his neighbourhood. Maybe Damon could keep us informed as well, plus other Mo Tat Wan residents, I hope!

"Lamma faces renewed threat

Christine Loh has got it right again - nature is one of Hong Kong's greatest assets ("Nature's riches", July 13).

So why are government departments allowing plans for the despoliation of South Lamma to rise from the dead? In support of Baroque on Lamma, an "environmental consultancy" wants to drill and excavate more than 40 sites there in the coming months for an "archaeological survey" bizarrely authorised by the Antiquities and Monuments Office.

The Town Planning Department rejected the entire Baroque on Lamma development proposal in December 2011; 50 per cent of the digging and drilling will be done on public land zoned conservation area and coastal protection area, according to documents provided by the Lands Department.

Is the Town Planning Department decision irrelevant for other departments? Can zoning regulations issued by one department be disregarded by another? An original concept of "planning process" indeed.

Martin Bode, Wan Chai"

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:12 am ]
Post subject: 

Alan wrote:
To be far, archaeologists are usually careful to restore the site after they've done their dig.

Watching archaeologists from AMO and YSW's ArchAssess (not involved in this project) at work, the ERM-employed archeologists will likely do their best to fully restore the borehole locations. They wouldn't want embarrassing photos of any messes left behind to be published, I'd guess.
Mo Tat Wan residents, reporters and the Lamma-zine will definitely be eager to get photos of the works in progress and after completion.

The last archaeological survey of South Lamma was done in 1998 by the Govt.; it yielded some pretty fascinating info about the history of the area and the villages down there, how old some of the artefacts are and what might be worth protecting. The results of this new survey will also be made public, I think.

Author:  damonwong [ Wed Aug 01, 2012 2:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

Lands Department reject ERM's apply for digging(LD DLO/IS MH 0040)


香港環境資源管理有限公司(ERM)為博寮港有限公司的顧問公司。而南丫島博寮港計劃(下稱“該工程項目”)是在《環境影響評估條例》下的指定工程項目。根據環境保護署在二零一一年七月發出該工程項目的環境影響評估研究概要號碼 ESB-229/2011,工程項目倡議人必須進行考古影響評估,以作為環境影響評估(下稱“環評”)研究的文化遺產影響評估的一部分。



1. 發給村代表及南丫島的離島區議會議員(就此個案而言,向模達灣、模達村、榕樹下村及東澳村的村代表送達通告);
2. 在實地或有關的物業張貼;
3. 鄉事委員會主席(視乎地點,把有關通告發給(北段)鄉事委員會或(南段)鄉事委員會,而就本個案而言,則送達通告給(南段)鄉事委員會;
4. 在有關鄉村的政府告示板張貼;以及
5. 在本處告示板張貼。



謝謝你對區內事務的關注。如有本信內容有任何查詢,請致電 2852 4262聯絡本人。

辦公室電話:2852 4262

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Thu Oct 11, 2012 9:29 am ]
Post subject: 

Click above for the entire invitation.

Registration form:

Author:  Boss [ Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:12 am ]
Post subject: 

Am I being completely dense and missing something here?

Apart of the 'obvious' reference to the Eden Project this company seems to have no other connection to it apart from its name.

The company seems to be set up purely for the BOL project - at least that seems to be the only item they are/have been working on.

Does anyone know anything more about the company?

And who will have a full half day to invest in listening to their views? Will they listen to ours?

Author:  Alan [ Thu Oct 11, 2012 1:51 pm ]
Post subject: 

Boss wrote:
Am I being completely dense and missing something here?

Just part of the continuing strategy of greenwashing the Baroque plan to build a mini Disco Bay.

Author:  PoWahYuen [ Thu Oct 11, 2012 2:35 pm ]
Post subject: 

So they decided to build a couple of massive green houses instead, nice.

Someone should point out about the climate here and in UK, might not need a green house at all, in fact they could just leave it exactly the way it is.

Actually, I can feel a protest coming on, anyone game?
They're even laying on a ferry!!

Author:  Billy Goat Gruff [ Sun Oct 21, 2012 11:00 pm ]
Post subject:  Baroque on Lamma consultation at Mo Tat Wan

Ciara Shannon of Eden Ventures has contacted me and confirmed the meeting has been cancelled, the Eden Project team (no link to Eden Ventures) has decided not to attend and the promised baseline review has not been completed. A bit of a fiasco all round!

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Mon Oct 22, 2012 9:46 am ]
Post subject: 

Any reasons given for the Eden Project cancelling (or postponing?) their HK visit to present their project, reasons from any of the parties involved?

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Wed Oct 24, 2012 11:43 am ]
Post subject: 

The meeting has been postponed, not cancelled. No info on a new date available:

postponement-wp.jpg [ 197.93 KiB | Viewed 5650 times ]

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:43 pm ]
Post subject: 

What's happening with the Baroque on Lamma project?

Here's their latest newsletter from their Blog of Baroque:

Newsletter-007-Eng-2020-1-wp.jpg [ 256.59 KiB | Viewed 5173 times ]
Newsletter-007-Eng-2020-2-wp.jpg [ 253.75 KiB | Viewed 5173 times ]

Author:  Marc Antony [ Tue Jul 02, 2013 6:56 pm ]
Post subject: 

If this report is correct, Baroque have pulled a fast one. Apparently a revised development proposal for south Lamma has been available for public consultation, but the period ended on 27th June 2013, and the Town Planning Board will hear the case on 8th July. ... and-hotel/

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Tue Jul 02, 2013 7:04 pm ]
Post subject: 

Sounds like somebody got the year wrong. It looks exactly like the last application and I haven't heard anything about this yet. Progress as known, see above.

I'll chase up my sources right away, but if this would be true it would mean that all of us Lammaites keeping a close eye on this project are totally uninformed and out of the loop.

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Tue Jul 02, 2013 9:23 pm ]
Post subject: 

Feedback from BoL:

"The fact is that we have not made any resubmission yet. Content of the post seems to be taken from last submission to TPB back in 2011 and are outdated by now.
The dates are fictitious. We don’t know the purpose of the post."

Author:  Marc Antony [ Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:28 am ]
Post subject: 

Tks LG. Panic over. The publication should remove the story if it's BS.

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Wed Jul 03, 2013 8:28 am ]
Post subject: 

The Real News HK has deleted their cover story, after somebody alerted the writer about his major "mistake".
No explanation or apology so far...

Author:  Alan [ Wed Jul 03, 2013 12:53 pm ]
Post subject: 

Marc Antony wrote:
Tks LG. Panic over. The publication should remove the story if it's BS.

Aside from the date of the application, the rest of the story looks well researched.
A slip up, not a hoax.
The same guy, Hip Kee,also wrote about the oil spill.

Seems likely he lives in south Lamma.

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Thu Oct 17, 2013 1:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Baroque on Lamma

New "Blog of Baroque" story, the first one in 3 months:

The Emerging Yachting Industry in Asia, A Golden Opportunity for Hong Kong (2013/10/16)

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Thu Jun 12, 2014 1:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Baroque on Lamma

Baroque on Lamma newsletter:

"Comprehensive Low Carbon Development Framework of The Baroque on Lamma – Energy"
plus some "Words of Wisdom"...

Author:  Lamma-Gung [ Thu Oct 09, 2014 1:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: The Baroque on Lamma

The latest plans of Baroque on Lamma for "Eco-destination of Lamma":

Photo6.jpg [ 87.53 KiB | Viewed 3988 times ]

Page 13 of 15 All times are UTC + 8 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group