Foxy {L_WROTE}:
So Zep, do you think the upland flora has evolved to survive regular fires? That would explain the lack of natural forest on the hills. Don't forget that natural fires from lighting strikes could extend the time-frame for the evolutionary aspect. And the typhoons of course. Ecologists call this a disaster or disclimatic (quarternary) succesion, I believe.
The flora hasn't evolved; just been selected. Idiots have been setting fires here for maybe a century or two, not long enough for evolution to get far. Plants evolve to accommodate fire in hot dry climates, like parts of Australia where some plants can't germinate until their seeds have been heated to over boiling point. I very much doubt that there were natural forest fires here more than once a century or even millennium before people lived here.
There are patches of natural forest around, such as near the power station, basically places where there are no graves for one reason or another, and/or too far from villages to suffer being harvested for firewood.
In 1841 when the British claimed HK it was described as a "barren rock" because of the lack of vegetation from locals cutting it for firewood. Don't hear much about Lamma of that period, but it was probably similar. The government protected the hills in HK to improve the watersheds. It was well forested after a few decades, but was stripped bare again during WWII and had to start again. If it wasn't for the criminally careless firebugs who set fires every holiday we'd be well on the way to having forest everywhere here.