I've got several comments back already from Save Lamma, within just a few hours.
This seems to have been quite a badly researched story in the SCMP with a lot of distortions and half-truths. The story refers ONLY to the 2nd phase of the harbour reclamation, not the proposed Ring Road through the Yung Shue Long valley, by the way, as some suspected.
The reporter obviously also didn't speak to anybody in Save Lamma at all, who were quite surprised by the story as well. They said that they had supported the general idea of providing a waterfront walkway suitable for pedestrian and EVA use, although they still have considerable reservations about how the detailed plan will be handled. See new plan in another topic in this forum.
Alex Chan {L_WROTE}:
Save Lamma Campaign did not "approve" any plan. Earlier, we just agreed to some very broad development principles with no concrete plan. The plan that Phyllis Li talked about was just indicative and we are very much concerned about still excessive reclamation along the water front.
I think it sounds like some back & forth arguments between the District Council and the Planning Dept. And I don't think the Lamma reclamation will be approved by the Govt in any foreseable future, given the current fiscal deficit.
The most important thing now is to push for the release of land on Phase I so we can build some better facilities: such as relocation of the refuse collection point, a community hall, etc.