mossuie {L_WROTE}:
yes you have indeed explained ad nauseum, even though I admitted twice my calculation was wrong.
My point was that the myth has taken a life of its own. Alastair wrote "if we use 200 times the power usually needed during these three pinned minutes, so watt?" That's what I was despairing of.
mossuie {L_WROTE}:
But your calculation was just as bollocks as mine. I don't see how the fact that an amount of energy would burn out a house fuse proves anything. It's a shoddy argument, Alan. If you want to go on and on, then why don't you do it right?
No, it's a scientific argument. It embodies an empirical proof: if the amount of energy required was the vast amount originally claimed, your household circuits would blow when you turned on the light. Since this does not happen, we conclude that a the maximum power drawn is much less. And as the power spike is very brief, the total energy is negligible. I could work out more precisely, but neither empirical proof nor simple high school physics make any impact. So I give up. The world is flat.